Watchmen trailer catches the MPAA’s eye

July 21, 2008 at 3:45 am 8 comments

I don’t think a measly two minutes and twenty seconds has ever done so much for a film’s hype as the “Watchmen” trailer run-time did for the upcoming super-hero epic. I went to the midnight showing of “The Dark Knight,” and one of the loudest cheers of the whole night came during the teaser for the flick; The subsequent buzz on the intwerwebs has been nothing sort of fanatical, with “just what the hell is ‘Watchmen’?” posts popping up all over to break the trailer down frame-by-tiny-frame for those who may not have been exposed to the critically acclaimed graphic novel penned by Alan Moore in the ’80s (example: Cinematical).

News comes in today from Cinema Blend that “The Dark Knight” movie-goers and uber-geeks around the country aren’t the only ones getting worked up by it. The Motion Picture Association of America decided that the trailer, which depicted a a really short, blink-and-you-miss-it shot of a gun-wielding assassin getting beaten up, needed to be altered before it could be shown in front of “The Dark Knight.” The news perplexed Zack Snyder, who is making his directorial follow-up to “300” with “Watchmen.”

“The MPAA said, ‘Look you can’t have him [holding the gun]‘ … I don’t even think it’s one second. I think it’s like 12 frames. He’s pointing the gun at the camera, and they said, ‘You can’t do that.”

The article goes on to explain that the MPAA didn’t take issue in the gun’s presence (it’s not fired or used in any way, other than to point at the guy beating him up). Instead, the fact that the gun is pointed in the general direction of the camera lens is cited as the reason why the MPAA was irked with the particular shot.

So how does a director, who is under extreme pressure to succeed with this project because of the book’s enormous popularity and acclaim, appease both the eager audience members and the MPAA board in a tight situation? Easy — steal a page from Steven Spielberg’s book.

In a move that was hotly disputed, Spielberg digitally removed all the guns from his mega-hit “E.T.,” replacing them with walkie talkies for a recent re-release of the film. Snyder did the same thing on an obviously much smaller scale; in the “12-frame” sequence, he digitally changed the object in the assailants hand from a gun to a walkie talkie

“I was like, ‘Well, it worked for Spielberg, so we should do that. Just put a walkie-talkie in his hand!’ … [The editors] were like, ‘But then you cut to a real gun!’ but I’m like, ‘No one will ever see that; they’ll think he had a gun in the other shot, so it’s fine.”

In all honesty, I’ll be damned if I can tell that there was a change made. I watched and rewatched the trailer several times (the sequence in question comes at about the 1:33 mark), and I can’t tell that the object isn’t a gun, and I’d be willing to bet a lot of money no one caught the alteration without being told about it first. I really don’t think this is a big deal at all, especially because the actual film doesn’t sound like it’s in jeopardy of being altered in any way because of the change in the trailer.

The writer at Cinema Blend seems a ton more pissed off about this than I am, ranting for a little while about the MPAA’s inconsistency and hypocrisy, but it’s not like anyone noticed, cared or won’t see “Watchmen” because of the change. And as long as the MPAA doesn’t send the actual flick back to the editing board for small changes like this, I don’t really have a problem with it at all.

Anyways, I’d be interested to know if any of you can really, honestly tell that he’s holding a walkie talkie instead of a gun. Check out the trailer, and pay special attention at around the 1:33 mark:


Entry filed under: comic book movies, The Dark Knight, Watchmen. Tags: , , , , .

The Dark Knight claims box office history George A. Romero’s bringing Zombie back

8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. 300 was terrible  |  July 21, 2008 at 8:46 am

    if the director of 300 is directing this movie, it will be terrible. 300 was a shockingly hokey, fluffy movie. yuck.

  • 2. Munch  |  July 21, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    Now that’s pretty fascinating. 12 measily frames and like you said, you can barely tell whether or not it’s a gun or not. Gotta keep those images safe for the kids whose parents dragged them to the midnight show of The Dark Knight. And just why are there 6-year-olds sitting behind me talking to their parents throughout the movie??

  • 3. Trailer de Watchmen censurado « ¡Operación Mandril!  |  July 22, 2008 at 10:16 am

    […] Fuente: Movie Chutzpah […]

  • 4. Chris  |  July 22, 2008 at 3:21 pm

    It’s such an amazingly fast shot, you certainly can’t tell it’s a walkie-talkie now – I’m sure everyone assumes its a gun, if they even notice the object itself – and I’m sure it was impossible to tell before that the gun was aimed at the audience.

    In this day and age, with internet red band trailers, YouTube (not to mention X-Tube and imitators), Apple trailers, cable television, video podcasts, and so on, the MPAA and the FCC are completely antiquated and irrelevant. Taking issue with a fraction-of-a-second glimpse of a gun aimed at the viewer, simply because it violated the letter of some rule, is absurd.

    The movie, meanwhile, looks AWESOME. I never saw “300” because it looked to me like a giant clump of dung, but this looks to be very faithful to the source material, and I’m really looking forward to it.

  • 5. Who Will Watch the Watchmen? « This is for Geeks  |  July 27, 2008 at 8:54 pm

    […] of Frank Miller’s 300, the studio believes he could be the one to do it. Aside from the fervor the MPAA stirred up, I haven’t seen (or read) a lack of confidence on the part of fans. I was being cautiously […]

  • 6. Watchmen Movie - The Newest Trailer from Spike Awards  |  October 28, 2008 at 1:52 am

    […] already know we here at Binge Gamer love movies. So when the first Watchmen trailer was released at the beginning of The Dark Knight, despite Joker being what everyone was talking about, the trailer for Watchmen did not go […]

  • 7. Tanja  |  June 5, 2013 at 6:47 am

    I read this article completely concerning the
    difference of most up-to-date and earlier technologies, it’s amazing article.

  • 8. Jeffrey  |  June 9, 2013 at 5:10 pm

    hey there and thank you for your info – I have certainly picked up anything new from right here.

    I did however expertise several technical issues using this site, since I experienced to reload the web site many
    times previous to I could get it to load correctly.
    I had been wondering if your web host is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will very frequently affect your placement in google and could damage your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my e-mail and could look out for a lot more of your respective intriguing content. Make sure you update this again soon.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

%d bloggers like this: